People ex rel. Chesner v Warden, Otis Bantum Correctional Ctr.

Annotate this Case
People ex rel. Chesner v Warden, Otis Bantum Correctional Ctr. 2010 NY Slip Op 02004 [71 AD3d 499] March 16, 2010 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 28, 2010

The People of the State of New York ex rel. Dennis Chesner, Appellant,
v
Warden, Otis Bantum Correctional Center et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Elon Harpaz of counsel), for appellant.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York (Diana R.H. Winters of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Analisa Torres, J.), entered May 21, 2009, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner's preliminary parole revocation hearing was commenced within 15 days after execution of the warrant (Executive Law § 259-i [3] [c] [i]) and briefly adjourned, without objection, for legitimate reasons. Thus, there was no violation of the 15-day time limit (see People ex rel. Morant v Warden, Rikers Is., 35 AD3d 208 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 809 [2007]; Matter of Emmick v Enders, 107 AD2d 1066 [1985], appeal dismissed 65 NY2d 1050 [1985]).

Further, petitioner waived his objection to the timeliness of the hearing by failing to object to the adjournment and failing to show that he was prejudiced by it (see People ex rel. Morant v Warden, Rikers Is. 35 AD3d 208 [2006]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.