Schlam Stone & Dolan, LLP v Penquin Tenants Corp.

Annotate this Case
Schlam Stone & Dolan, LLP v Penquin Tenants Corp. 2010 NY Slip Op 01832 [71 AD3d 450] March 9, 2010 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Schlam Stone & Dolan, LLP, Respondent,
v
Penquin Tenants Corporation, Appellant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. David Goldsmith et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. Penquin Tenants Corporation, Appellant, v David Goldsmith et al., Respondents.

—[*1]Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from orders of the Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered on or about May 6, and May 7, 2009, and said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties; and due deliberation having been had thereon, and upon the stipulation of the parties hereto dated February 24, 2010, it is unanimously ordered that said appeals be and the same are hereby withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid stipulation. Concur—Friedman, J.P., McGuire, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.