Matter of Jackson v N.Y.S. Div. of Human Rights

Annotate this Case
Matter of Jackson v N.Y.S. Div. of Human Rights 2010 NY Slip Op 00400 [69 AD3d 501] January 21, 2010 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, March 10, 2010

In the Matter of Jacquelyn E. Jackson, Appellant,
v
N.Y.S. Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Jacquelyn E. Jackson, appellant pro se.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Paul G. Feinman, J.), entered on or about April 15, 2008, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding brought to annul the determination of respondent New York State Division of Human Rights (DHR), dated September 28, 2007, finding no probable cause to believe that respondent Retail Brand Alliance, Inc. had engaged in discriminatory employment practices, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dismissal of the proceeding was appropriate since it was brought more than 60 days after service of DHR's determination (see Executive Law § 298; Matter of Gil v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 17 AD3d 365 [2005]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Sweeny, Catterson and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.