Matter of Hodge v Richardson

Annotate this Case
Matter of Hodge v Richardson 2009 NY Slip Op 09308 [68 AD3d 555] December 15, 2009 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 10, 2010

In the Matter of Martin Hodge, Petitioner,
v
Clark V. Richardson, Respondent.

—[*1] Martin Hodge, petitioner pro se.

Michael Colodner, New York (John Eiseman of counsel), for respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.