Maldonado v Algil Holding Co., LLC.
Annotate this CaseRichard Maldonado, Respondent,
v
Algil Holding Co., LLC, Appellant.
—[*1] Smith, Mazure, Director, Wilkins, Young & Yagerman, P.C., New York (Stacy I. Malinow of counsel), for appellant.
Getz & Braverman, P.C., Bronx (James P. Benintendi of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered on or about July 20, 2009, which granted plaintiff's show-cause motion to vacate a default and restore this action to the calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff demonstrated a reasonable excuse by showing that his default resulted from law office failure to calendar and timely oppose defendant's discovery motion (see Simpson v Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc., 48 AD3d 389, 392 [2008]), and also demonstrated merit to his cause (see Palermo v Lord & Taylor, 287 AD2d 258, 260 [2001]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Roman, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.