Maldonado v Algil Holding Co., LLC.

Annotate this Case
Maldonado v Algil Holding Co., LLC 2009 NY Slip Op 09286 [68 AD3d 531] December 15, 2009 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Richard Maldonado, Respondent,
v
Algil Holding Co., LLC, Appellant.

—[*1] Smith, Mazure, Director, Wilkins, Young & Yagerman, P.C., New York (Stacy I. Malinow of counsel), for appellant.

Getz & Braverman, P.C., Bronx (James P. Benintendi of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered on or about July 20, 2009, which granted plaintiff's show-cause motion to vacate a default and restore this action to the calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff demonstrated a reasonable excuse by showing that his default resulted from law office failure to calendar and timely oppose defendant's discovery motion (see Simpson v Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc., 48 AD3d 389, 392 [2008]), and also demonstrated merit to his cause (see Palermo v Lord & Taylor, 287 AD2d 258, 260 [2001]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Roman, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.