Arya's Collection, Inc. v Brink's Global Servs., USA, Inc.

Annotate this Case
Arya's Collection, Inc. v Brink's Global Servs., USA, Inc. 2009 NY Slip Op 08464 [67 AD3d 525] November 17, 2009 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Arya's Collection, Inc., Appellant,
v
Brink's Global Services, USA, Inc., Respondent.

—[*1] Michael C. Marcus, Long Beach, for appellant.

White Fleischner & Fino, LLP, New York (Jonathan S. Chernow of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered October 15, 2008, which, in an action for breach of a contract to transport plaintiff's jewelry, granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint on the basis of a forum selection clause, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The documentary evidence conclusively demonstrates that the show receipts claimed by defendant to constitute the parties' only agreement relating to the subject shipment contained a forum selection clause (see Tatko Stone Prods., Inc. v Davis-Giovinzazzo Constr. Co., Inc., 65 AD3d 778, 779-780 [2009]). Defendant showed that the clause was reasonably communicated to plaintiff and mandatory for all claims arising from the shipment of the jewelry; in response, plaintiff failed to rebut the presumption of enforceability by showing that enforcement would be unreasonable, unjust or invalid (see Altvater Gessler-J.A. Baczewski Intl. [USA] Inc. v Sobieski Destylarnia S.A., 572 F3d 86, 89 [2d Cir 2009]), where plaintiff's employee who actually signed and accepted the show receipts offered no evidence bearing on his awareness of the forum selection clause on the back of the receipts. The document claimed by plaintiff to constitute a second agreement governing the return shipment is nothing more than an acknowledgment by plaintiff of the delivery of the outbound shipment. Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Saxe, McGuire, Acosta and Roman, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2008 NY Slip Op 32818(U).]

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.