Guinter v I. Park Lake Success, LLC
Annotate this CaseJohn Guinter, Plaintiff,
v
I. Park Lake Success, LLC, et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Rivco Construction Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
—[*1] Conway, Farrell, Curtin & Kelly, P.C., New York (Keith D. Grace of counsel), for appellants.
Melito & Adolfsen, P.C., New York (Robert D. Ely of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered on or about June 16, 2009, which, to the extent appealed from, granted third-party defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Given that third-party plaintiff Ball, as contractor, retained authority over the work site and actually performed the cleanup and maintenance, third-party defendant subcontractor owed it no duty to maintain the site (Lopez v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., 40 NY2d 605 [1976]). While the subcontractor was liable to indemnify for injury resulting from its own acts or omissions, it was not liable, as a matter of law, for injury manifestly caused by the contractor's maintenance of a debris pile. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Renwick, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.