Matter of Belolipskaia v Guerrand

Annotate this Case
Matter of Belolipskaia v Guerrand 2009 NY Slip Op 06591 [65 AD3d 932] September 22, 2009 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, November 4, 2009

In the Matter of Vladlena Belolipskaia, Appellant,
v
Mathias Guerrand, Respondent.

—[*1] Jody N. Gerber, New York, for appellant.

Robert S. Michaels, P.C., New York (Robert S. Michaels of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda J. Cohen, J.), entered on or about March 10, 2008, which denied petitioner's objection to an earlier Support Magistrate's order denying her second motion to amend the caption on an order of filiation, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the objection sustained and the caption amended to include respondent's alias of Guerrand-Hermes.

The court should not have denied the motion for petitioner's failure to file timely objections to the Support Magistrate's order. The time to file such objections begins to run on service of that order with notice of entry (Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Dietrich, 208 AD2d 474 [1994]), which concededly never took place. Moreover, given that respondent stated his name as Guerrand-Hermes on his tax returns and his passport, and the child may have an interest in various trusts or other assets relating to the Hermes family, the court should have conformed respondent's name on the order of filiation to match that of the child (see Matter of J.O.T., 120 Misc 2d 817 [1983]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Andrias, Catterson, Acosta and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.