Superb Gen. Contr. Co. v City of New York

Superb Gen. Contr. Co. v City of New York 2009 NY Slip Op 03619 [62 AD3d 423] May 5, 2009 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Superb General Contracting Co., Appellant,
v
City of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

—[*1] Agovino & Asselta, LLP, Mineola (Robert C. Buff of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Karen M. Griffin of counsel), for City of New York, respondent.

Landman Corsi Ballaine & Ford P.C., New York (Christopher G. Fretel of counsel), for Amherst Rehab Associates, Inc. and Amherst Development Services Corporation, respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), entered July 18, 2008, which granted defendant City's motion for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action and granted the other defendants' cross motion to dismiss the entire complaint against the Amherst defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

On a prior order (39 AD3d 204 [2007], lv dismissed 10 NY3d 800 [2008]), we dismissed the second through seventh causes of action against the City and the entire complaint against defendant S.J. Rehab, under the statute of limitations. That ruling constituted law of the case, precluding plaintiff from raising the issue on the present appeal (see Clark Constr. Corp. v BLF Realty Holding Corp., 54 AD3d 604 [2008]; J-Mar Serv. Ctr., Inc. v Mahoney, Connor & Hussey, 45 AD3d 809 [2007]), and plaintiff even conceded as much. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ.