People v Gomez

Annotate this Case
People v Gomez 2007 NY Slip Op 10051 [46 AD3d 396] December 20, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 13, 2008

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Luis Gomez, Appellant.

—[*1] Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York City (Daniel A. Warshawsky of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Dennis Rambaud of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), rendered August 17, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of six years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid written waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737 [2006]). Even if we were to construe defendant's present challenge to his plea as a voluntariness claim, which would survive the waiver, we would find that the plea was knowing, voluntary and intelligent, and that the court properly denied defendant's motion to withdraw it (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520 [1978]). Defendant received a full opportunity to advance his claim of innocence, which was unsupported and contradicted by the plea allocution. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Marlow, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.