People v Flores

Annotate this Case
People v Flores 2007 NY Slip Op 09691 [46 AD3d 302] December 11, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 13, 2008

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Jose Hernandez Flores, Appellant.

—[*1] Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Grace Vee of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), entered on or about June 9, 2006, which denied defendant's motion to be resentenced pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005, unanimously affirmed.

The court correctly denied defendant's motion since he was less than three years from his parole eligibility date when he filed the motion (see People v Bautista, 26 AD3d 230 [2006], appeal dismissed 7 NY3d 838 [2006]). Since defendant was clearly ineligible, as a matter of law, for resentencing, there was no reason for the court to assign counsel or conduct a hearing (see People v Santana, 44 AD3d 340 [2007]). Concur—Marlow, J.P., Nardelli, Williams and McGuire, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.