People v Arana

Annotate this Case
People v Arana 2007 NY Slip Op 08362 [45 AD3d 311] November 8, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 16, 2008

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Luis Arana, Aso Known as Fernando Franco, Appellant.

—[*1] Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City (Carl S. Kaplan of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Tracy L. Conn of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), entered on or about December 5, 2006, which denied defendant's motion to be resentenced pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act, unanimously affirmed.

Following our remand (32 AD3d 305 [2006]), the court properly determined that "substantial justice dictates that the application should be denied" (L 2004, ch 738, § 23). The record establishes that the court based its decision on defendant's participation in a very extensive drug trafficking enterprise, and that defendant's nationality was not a factor in the denial of his motion. We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Catterson and Kavanagh, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.