D'Antonio v Hiller

Annotate this Case
D'Antonio v Hiller 2007 NY Slip Op 05346 [41 AD3d 240] June 19, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Thomas W. D'Antonio et al., Appellants,
v
Gary Hiller et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Weg and Myers, P.C., New York (Joshua L. Mallin of counsel), for appellants.

Weinberg, Gross & Pergament LLP, Garden City (Marc A. Pergament of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered May 22, 2006, which, in an action for breach of a shareholders agreement and breach of fiduciary duty arising out of defendant employees/shareholders/directors' termination of plaintiff employee/shareholder's employment with the corporation and demand to buy back his shares, granted defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Documentary evidence establishes that defendants' termination of plaintiff's employment and demand to buy back his shares was in accordance with the controlling provisions of the shareholders agreement and bylaws, and requires that the complaint be dismissed (see Gallagher v Lambert, 74 NY2d 562, 567 [1989]; Ingle v Glamore Motor Sales, 73 NY2d 183, 189 [1989]). Concur—Marlow, J.P., Williams, Gonzalez, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.