Taveras v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth.

Taveras v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth. 2007 NY Slip Op 04889 [41 AD3d 158] June 7, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Jose Taveras, Appellant,
v
Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, New York (Kenneth J. Gorman of counsel), for appellant.

Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn (Anita Isola of counsel), for respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered September 2, 2005, which, upon a jury verdict finding plaintiff 40% at fault, awarded plaintiff the total sum of $494,280, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, the verdict set aside and a new trial directed as to all issues, unless defendant, within 30 days of service of a copy of this order with notice of entry, stipulates to increase the total award by including therein an award for future pain and suffering, prior to apportionment, of $400,000, and to entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith.

Plaintiff was struck by defendant's bus while riding his bike across the George Washington Bridge and was seriously injured. Given his extended hospitalization, the multiple surgical procedures he had to endure, and the permanent nature of some of his injuries, the verdict's lack of an award for future pain and suffering deviates materially from what is reasonable compensation under the circumstances to the extent indicated above (CPLR 5501 [c]; Singh v Catamount Dev. Corp., 21 AD3d 824 [2005]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Williams, Buckley and Kavanagh, JJ.