Greenky v Aytes

Annotate this Case
Greenky v Aytes 2007 NY Slip Op 04575 [40 AD3d 545] May 31, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Seth Greenky, Doing Business as Green Key Management, Respondent,
v
Rochelle S. Aytes, Appellant.

—[*1] Pryor Cashman Sherman & Flynn LLP, New York (Jacob B. Radcliff of counsel), for appellant.

David Scott, New York (Paul Biedka of counsel), for respondent. Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered September 20, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant's cross motion for a stay of this action pending arbitration, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the cross motion granted.

As "[a]ctions may be stayed temporarily pending arbitration proceedings where the resolution of the issues in the latter may also resolve and render academic issues in the former" (American Tr. Ins. Co. v Associated Intl. Ins. Co., 210 AD2d 133, 133 [1994], quoting Corbetta Constr. Co. v Driscoll Co., 17 AD2d 176, 179 [1962]), the court erred in denying the stay herein. The personal management agreement contained a broad arbitration clause, and the exception for "collection of any past due monies" is inapplicable since issues in the underlying arbitration include, inter alia, whether the agreement was void ab initio or, alternatively, had been validly terminated, which would render any claim of monies due moot. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Gonzalez, Catterson and Kavanagh, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.