Staine v Summit Place, Inc.

Annotate this Case
Staine v Summit Place, Inc. 2007 NY Slip Op 04052 [40 AD3d 330] May 10, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Shelly Staine, Appellant,
v
Summit Place, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Mansion Homes, Inc., Respondent.

—[*1] DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Tartaglia Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP, White Plains (Jacob E. Amir of counsel), for appellant.

John A. Cannistraci, New York (Anetta V. Ekenberg of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dianne T. Renwick, J.), entered November 17, 2005, which canceled plaintiff's notice of pendency, dismissed the action and directed the Clerk to enter judgment declaring defendant Mansion Homes the lawful fee owner, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In support of its counterclaim for a declaratory judgment as to title, defendant Mansion Homes submitted documentary evidence of its ownership of the disputed property. The party that purportedly conveyed the lot to plaintiff never had record title to that property, and a grantor cannot convey that which it does not own. It is well settled that, "title and estate which passes under a grant or conveyance, is commensurate only with that existing in the grantor, although he may undertake to convey, and the deed purports to convey a larger estate" (Thompson v Simpson, 128 NY 270, 285 [1891]; Real Property Law § 245). Furthermore, construction of the plain language of a deed is a question of law for the court to determine (Spencer v Connolly, 25 AD3d 832, 834 [2006]). Even had the grantor acquired fee title to the subject lot, the deed between it and plaintiff makes no specific mention of it.

To the extent that the metes-and-bounds description of the property actually conveyed to plaintiff may have been incorrect, there is no authority for the proposition that such a faulty [*2]description establishes a claim to property not set forth in the deed, title to which was never recorded, and which was never conveyed to plaintiff's grantor. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.