People v Quezada
Annotate this CaseThe People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Jose Quezada, Appellant.
—[*1] Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Natalie Rea of counsel), for appellant.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Andrew Rafalaf of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J., at hearing; Micki A. Scherer, J., at plea and sentence), rendered June 23, 2004, convicting defendant of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 7 to 21 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant made valid written and oral waivers of his right to appeal (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]), which foreclose his suppression and excessive sentence claims. The court did not conflate the right to appeal with the rights automatically forfeited by pleading guilty. In any event, were we to find that defendant did not make a valid waiver of his right to appeal, we would find that the court properly denied defendant's suppression motion and that there is no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.