Friedland v New York City Dept. of Educ.

Friedland v New York City Dept. of Educ. 2007 NY Slip Op 03571 [39 AD3d 395] April 24, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 6, 2007

Barbara Friedland, Appellant,
v
New York City Department of Education, Respondent.

—[*1] Wolf & Wolf, LLP, Bronx (Edward H. Wolf of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Dona B. Morris of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered December 13, 2005, which dismissed this CPLR article 78 proceeding as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This probationary principal failed to commence this proceeding within four months from the termination date of her employment (see Matter of Lipton v New York City Bd. of Educ., 284 AD2d 140 [2001]). Petitioner's claims of procedural irregularities in the administrative review process are not borne out by the record. We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.