Archibald v Asia Five Eight, LLC

Annotate this Case
Archibald v Asia Five Eight, LLC 2007 NY Slip Op 03346 [39 AD3d 366] April 19, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 6, 2007

Lester Archibald, Appellant,
v
Asia Five Eight, LLC, Doing Business as Tao, Respondent.

—[*1] Bernard A. Anderson, New York, for appellant.

Billig Law, P.C., New York (Darin S. Billig of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.; so ordered by Jacqueline W. Silbermann, J.), entered December 7, 2006, which dismissed the complaint for failure to prosecute, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Whether to grant an adjournment is a matter within the discretion of the trial court (see Matter of Steven B., 6 NY3d 888, 889 [2006]). Although there is no indication of delay by plaintiff in the litigation of this matter until the day of trial, it remains that neither plaintiff's counsel of record nor plaintiff's newly retained trial counsel provided the court or the defense with advance notice of plaintiff's purported inability to proceed to trial on the appointed date, and instead, submitted, on the day of the scheduled trial, an affidavit of engagement that admittedly contained misstatements of fact. Not only did plaintiff's counsel of record act contrary to the mandate of 22 NYCRR 202.31 by retaining outside trial counsel fewer than 10 days before the trial was to begin, but the attorney retained was clearly not prepared to try the matter on the scheduled date. In view of counsel's noncompliance with 22 NYCRR 202.31 and the trial attorney's false representations to the court, we cannot say that the trial court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiff an adjournment and, when plaintiff refused to proceed, dismissing the action for failure to prosecute.

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Sweeny, Malone and Kavanagh, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.