Matter of Jazminn O'Dell P. (Victoria C.)

Annotate this Case
Matter of Jazminn O'Dell P. 2007 NY Slip Op 02818 [39 AD3d 235] April 3, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 6, 2007

In the Matter of Jazminn O'Dell P., Also Known as Jazzminn P., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Victoria C., Appellant; Graham-Windham Services to Families and Children, Respondent.

—[*1] John J. Marafino, Mount Vernon, for appellant.

Carrieri & Carrieri, P.C., Mineola (Ralph R. Carrieri of counsel), for respondent.

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Judith Waksberg of counsel), and Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, New York (Martin Klotz of counsel), Law Guardian.

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sara P. Schechter, J.), entered on or about July 13, 2005, which, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated the respondent mother's parental rights with respect to the subject child and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although the finding of permanent neglect is not challenged, respondent contends that her efforts to remediate the problems leading to the child's placement warrant a suspended judgment. While those efforts are commendable, the record affords little basis to conclude that the child's best interests would ultimately be served by a suspended judgment (see Matter of Michael B., 80 NY2d 299, 311 [1992]). The child, now six years of age, has bonded with her foster parents with whom she has lived since infancy, and there was no evidence of a parental relationship with the [*2]mother sufficient to justify delay of the adoptive process (see Matter of Amanda R., 215 AD2d 220, 221 [1995]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Nardelli and Buckley, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.