Matter of Crispino v Morgenthau
Annotate this Case
Matter of Crispino v Morgenthau
2007 NY Slip Op 01779 [38 AD3d 210]
March 1, 2007
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, May 9, 2007
In the Matter of Domenick Crispino, Appellant,
v
Robert M. Morgenthau, as District Attorney of New York County, Respondent.
In the Matter of Domenick Crispino, Appellant,
v
Robert M. Morgenthau, as District Attorney of New York County, Respondent.
—[*1] Domenick Crispino, appellant pro se.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Grace Vee of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J.), entered October 26, 2005, which denied the petition in this CPLR article 78 proceeding, unanimously dismissed, without costs.
The District Attorney has furnished the documents sought in petitioner's FOIL request, thereby rendering this appeal moot. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Williams, McGuire and Kavanagh, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
