Martinez v Fernandez

Annotate this Case
Martinez v Fernandez 2007 NY Slip Op 01621 [37 AD3d 373] February 27, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Hilario Martinez, Respondent,
v
Damian Fernandez, Appellant, and Alan L. Sokoloff et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Votto, Cassata & Gullo, LLP, Staten Island (Christopher J. Albee of counsel), for appellant. No brief or appearance on behalf of Hilario Martinez, respondent. Cohen, Kuhn & Associates, New York (Robert D. Wilkins of counsel), for Sokoloff respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George D. Salerno, J.), entered March 29, 2006, which denied defendant-appellant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant's motion for summary judgment was properly denied, without prejudice to renewal, so as to afford plaintiff a reasonable opportunity to obtain discovery from the Sokoloff defendants respecting the circumstances of the automobile accident pertinent to determining if liability may be assigned to appellant (see Catena v Amsterdam Mem. Hosp., 6 AD3d 1037, 1038-1039 [2004]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.