Maritsa Zambrana v New York City Transit Authority
Annotate this Case
Zambrana v New York City Tr. Auth.
2004 NY Slip Op 09401
Decided on December 16, 2004
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on December 16, 2004
Buckley, P.J., Lerner, Friedman, Sweeny, Catterson, JJ.
4078
[*1]Maritsa Zambrana, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v
The New York City Transit Authority, Defendant-Appellant.
Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn (Lawrence Heisler of counsel),
for appellant.
Finz & Finz, P.C., Jericho (Jay L. Feigenbaum of counsel), for
respondents.
Decided on December 16, 2004
Buckley, P.J., Lerner, Friedman, Sweeny, Catterson, JJ.
4078
[*1]Maritsa Zambrana, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v
The New York City Transit Authority, Defendant-Appellant.
Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn (Lawrence Heisler of counsel),
for appellant.
Finz & Finz, P.C., Jericho (Jay L. Feigenbaum of counsel), for
respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered August 11, 2003, reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion for summary judgment granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.
Opinion by Buckley, P.J. All concur.
Order filed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
