Kenneth Bressler v David A. Kalow

Annotate this Case
Bressler v Kalow 2004 NY Slip Op 08962 [13 AD3d 70] December 2, 2004 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 23, 2005

Kenneth Bressler, Respondent,
v
David A. Kalow et al., Appellants.

—[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe, III, J.), entered on or about June 15, 2004, which denied defendants' motion to strike plaintiff's jury demand, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff's claims are primarily legal in nature, affording him the opportunity for full relief by means of a monetary award under the facts as alleged (see Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft v Spinale, 177 AD2d 315 [1991]). Since plaintiff pursued an accounting merely to determine the amount of such damages, the initial joinder of prayers for legal and equitable relief did not constitute a waiver of the right to a jury trial in the first instance (Lex Tenants Corp. v Gramercy N. Assoc., 284 AD2d 278 [2001]).

We have considered defendants' remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Lerner, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.