WM Specialty Mortgage LLC v. Johnson
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 WM SPECIALTY MORTGAGE, LLC, 3 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellee, 4 v. No. 35,166 5 GREG JOHNSON, a/k/a 6 GREGORY P. JOHNSON; and 7 OLGA JOHNSON, 8 Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellants, 9 and 10 HOME LOAN SERVICES, INC., 11 f/k/a NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE CO., 12 Defendants, 13 and 14 GREG JOHNSON and OLGA JOHNSON, 15 Third-Party Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 ACCREDITED HOME LENDERS, INC.; 18 NATIONWIDE CREDIT, INC.; 19 BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS; 1 2 3 4 5 6 WM SPECIALTY MORTGAGE, LLC; NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE, INC.; FINANCIAL MORTGAGE GROUP, LLC; and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Third-Party Defendants. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 8 Nan G. Nash, District Judge 9 Montgomery & Andrews, P.A. 10 Seth C. McMillan 11 Santa Fe, NM 12 Quilling, Selander, Lownds Winslett & Moser, P.C. 13 Marcie L. Schout 14 Dallas, TX 15 for Appellee WM Specialty Mortgage, LLC 16 JRSPC, LLC 17 Joshua R. Simms 18 Albuquerque, NM 19 for Appellants and Third-Party Plaintiffs Greg and Olga Johnson 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION 21 VIGIL, Judge. 22 {1} Defendants-Appellants Greg Johnson and Olga Johnson (“Appellants”) seek to 23 appeal from two district court orders: the first one granting summary judgment to 24 Plaintiff-Appellee WM Specialty Mortgage, LLC (“WM”), and Third-Party Defendant 25 Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), [4 RP 1068] and the 26 second one denying Appellants’ motion to dismiss. [4 RP 1070] [DS unnumbered 1] 2 1 Summary dismissal was proposed for lack of a final order, and we additionally 2 proposed to calendar this case on the merits if a final order was submitted to this Court 3 within the time for filing a memorandum in opposition. On August 29, 2016, WM 4 filed an unopposed motion for extension of time to obtain a final order, and an 5 extension was granted until September 29, 2016. A second request for extension of 6 time was filed by WM, and an extension was granted until October 31, 2016. No 7 further extension requests were made, and a final order has not been filed in this 8 Court. 9 {2} Because no final order has been submitted to this Court, and the time for doing 10 so has expired, we dismiss the appeal. 11 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 {4} DISMISSED. 13 14 __________________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 15 WE CONCUR: 16 ___________________________ 17 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 18 ___________________________ 19 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
