Mosqueda-Mata v. De Haro

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 MARIA MOSQUEDA-MATA, 3 Petitioner-Appellant, 4 v. NO. 35,513 5 JUAN CARLOS DE HARO, 6 Respondent-Appellee. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY 8 Kea W. Riggs, District Judge 9 Sanders, Bruin, Coll & Worley, P.A. 10 Clayton S. Hightower 11 Roswell, NM 12 for Appellant 13 Kraft & Hunter LLP 14 Dustin E. Hunter 15 for Appellee 16 17 VIGIL, Chief Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 4 {2} AFFIRMED. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 _______________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 _________________________________ 10 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 11 _________________________________ 12 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.