Coke v. Stock
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 DEWEY C. COKE, 3 Worker-Appellee, 4 v. No. 35,097 5 STEVE STOCK d/b/a STOCK 6 TRANSPORTATION and MOUNTAIN 7 STATES INSURANCE GROUP, 8 Employer/Insurer-Appellants. 9 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION 10 Leonard J. Padilla, District Judge 11 LeeAnn Ortiz 12 Albuquerque, NM 13 for Appellee 14 15 16 17 18 Law Offices of Robert Bruce Collins Robert Bruce Collins Julie Koschtial Audra Davie Albuquerque, NM 19 for Appellant 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION 2 SUTIN, Judge. 3 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 4 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 5 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 6 {2} AFFIRMED. 7 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 __________________________________ JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 10 WE CONCUR: 11 _______________________________ 12 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 13 _______________________________ 14 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
