Community Housing Resources Inc. v. Boughton
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 COMMUNITY HOUSING RESOURCES, INC., 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. No. 34,993 5 ROBERT BOUGHTON and 6 LOUIS HILLE, 7 Defendants-Appellants. 8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 9 Alan M. Malott, District Judge 10 Community Housing Resources, Inc. 11 Christopher Ocksrider 12 Albuquerque, NM 13 for Appellee 14 Robert M. Boughton 15 Louis A. Hille 16 Albuquerque, NM 17 Pro Se Appellants 18 19 KENNEDY, Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 {1} Appellants Robert Boughton and Louis Hille (Defendants) appeal in a self- 2 represented capacity from the district court’s dismissal of their on-record appeal. Our 3 notice proposed to dismiss because Defendants failed to file the requisite notice of 4 appeal in the district court’s clerk’s office. See generally Govich v. North Am. Sys., 5 Inc., 1991-NMSC-061, ¶ 12, 112 N.M. 226, 814 P.2d 94 (explaining that the time and 6 place of filing for the notice of appeal is a mandatory precondition to appellate 7 jurisdiction). Defendants did not file a timely memorandum in opposition, and this 8 Court denied their request to file an untimely memorandum in opposition. 9 Accordingly, for the reasons detailed in our notice, we dismiss. 10 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 WE CONCUR: _______________________________ RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 14 ___________________________________ 15 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 16 ___________________________________ 17 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
