State v. Roybal
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. NO. 34,854 5 EUGENIO ROYBAL, 6 Defendant-Appellant. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY 8 Sarah C. Backus, District Judge 9 10 11 12 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM Jacqueline R. Medina, Assistant Attorney General Albuquerque, NM 13 for Appellee 14 15 16 17 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM Sergio Viscoli, Appellate Public Defender Albuquerque, NM 18 for Appellant 19 20 KENNEDY, Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed 2 summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed 3 and the time for doing so has expired. 4 {2} REVERSED. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 _______________________________ RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 ___________________________________ 10 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 11 _________________________________ 12 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
