State v. Daniel R.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, 4 v. NO. 34,490 5 DANIEL R., 6 Child-Appellee. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY 8 Angie K. Schneider, District Judge 9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM 11 for Appellant 12 Russell Dean Clark LLC 13 Russell Dean Clark 14 Las Cruces, NM 15 for Appellee 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION 17 GARCIA, Judge. 18 {1} The State appealed from the district court’s order granting, in part, Daniel R.’s 1 (Child) motion to suppress. This Court’s calendar notice proposed to affirm on the 2 basis that the district court’s findings supported the ruling that there were no exigent 3 circumstances justifying a warrantless entry into Child’s home, and therefore, the 4 officer violated Child’s rights to be free from an unreasonable search and seizure. [RP 5 145-46] The State filed a response to the proposed disposition stating that it does not 6 oppose the summary disposition. For these reasons, and those stated in this Court’s 7 calendar notice, we affirm. 8 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 ________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 11 WE CONCUR: 12 _______________________________ 13 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 14 _______________________________ 15 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
