Deaton v. Fry
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 HENRY D. DEATON, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, 4 v. 5 6 7 8 9 NO. 33,111 SANDRA V. FRY, MOISES GUTIERREZ, AURORA CALDWELL, and ANY AND ALL Unknown Claimants of Interest in the Premises Adverse to Plaintiff, Defendants-Appellees. 10 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 11 Clay Campbell, District Judge 12 13 14 15 Chappell Law Firm, P.A. Bill Chappell, Jr. Michael Hoeferkamp Albuquerque, NM 16 for Appellant 17 Mark A. Glenn 18 Albuquerque, NM 19 for Appellee Fry 20 Roibal Law Firm PA 21 Edward J. Roibal 22 Albuquerque, NM 1 for Appellee Gutierrez 2 Narciso Garcia, Jr. 3 Albuquerque, NM 4 for Appellee Caldwell 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION 6 VIGIL, Judge. 7 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 8 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 9 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 10 {2} DISMISSED. 11 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 _______________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 14 WE CONCUR: 15 ___________________________________ 16 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 17 _________________________________ 2 1 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
