Stevens v. UNMH
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 SHELLY STEVENS, 3 Worker-Appellant, 4 v. NO. 33,066 5 UNMH and RISK MANAGEMENT, 6 Employer/Insurer-Appellee. 7 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION 8 David Skinner, Workers Compensation Judge 9 Michael J. Doyle 10 Los Lunas, NM 11 for Appellant 12 Katherine E. Tourek 13 Albuquerque, NM 14 for Appellee 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 VIGIL, Judge. 17 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 18 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 1 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 2 {2} AFFIRMED. 3 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 _______________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 6 WE CONCUR: 7 ___________________________________ 8 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 9 _________________________________ 10 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
