City of Rio Rancho v. Hassley

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 CITY OF RIO RANCHO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. NO. 32,914 5 ALEXIS HASSLEY, 6 Defendant-Appellant, 7 City of Rio Rancho 8 Gina R. Manfredi 9 Rio Rancho, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Patrick J. Martinez 12 Albuquerque, NM 13 for Appellant 14 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY 15 John F. Davis, District Judge 16 17 GARCIA, Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reason stated in the notice of proposed 2 disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed, and the time 3 for doing so has expired. 4 {2} REVERSED. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 10 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 11 12 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.