Strautins v. Martinez

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO ROBERT D. STRAUTINS; LAURENCE J. and JACQUELINE N. ELLIOT; CRAIG D. and MICHELLE I. MCGREGOR; ROBERT L. and MYRA B. HULL; JOHN J. and MARY ELLEN BURKE; BURT MICHAEL and CINDY PLOTKIN; KLAUS VOIGTLANDER; and JAMES G. FARIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, 10 v. 11 12 DOMINGO MARTINEZ, Santa 13 Fe County Assessor, et al., 14 15 Defendants-Appellees. No. 32,771 [CONSOLIDATED WITH No. 32,802; No. 32,803; No. 32,804; No. 32,805; No. 32,806; No. 32,807; and No. 32,808] 16 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 17 Sarah M. Singleton, District Judge 18 L. Helen Bennett 19 Albuquerque, NM 20 for Appellants 21 Bridget Jacober 22 Santa Fe, NM 23 for Appellees 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION 2 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 3 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 4 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, 5 and the time for doing so has expired. 6 {2} Defendants-Appellees have filed a memorandum in support of the calendar 7 notice proposing summary affirmance of dismissal. 8 {3} Affirmed. 9 {4} IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 12 WE CONCUR: 13 14 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 15 16 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.