Polen v. Dotco

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 COREY POLEN, 3 Worker-Appellant, 4 v. NO. 32,538 5 DOTCO and BUILDER S TRUST, 6 Employer/Insurer-Appellee. 7 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION 8 Terry S. Kramer, Workers Compensation Judge 9 Titus & Murphy Law Firm 10 Victor A. Titus 11 Farmington, NM 12 for Appellant 13 Yenson, Allen & Wosick, P.C. 14 Joseph P. Turk 15 Albuquerque, NM 16 for Appellee 17 18 VANZI, Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed 2 summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed 3 and the time for doing so has expired. 4 REVERSED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 __________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 _________________________________ 10 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 11 _________________________________ 12 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.