City of Rio Rancho v. Hogan

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 CITY OF RIO RANCHO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. NO. 32,429 5 SEAN HOGAN, 6 Defendant-Appellant. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY 8 John F. Davis, District Judge 9 Gina R. Manfredi 10 Rio Rancho, NM 11 for Appellee 12 Kimberly A. Middlebrooks 13 Albuquerque, NM 14 for Appellant 15 16 WECHSLER, Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 4 {2} Accordingly, we dismiss for the reasons stated in our calendar notice. 5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 __________________________________ JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9 _________________________________ 10 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 11 _________________________________ 12 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.