State v. Soto-Tavison
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. NO. 32,002 5 ERNESTO SOTO-TAVISON, 6 Defendant, 7 and 8 DANIEL GOLDBERG, d/b/a 9 GOODFELLAS BAIL BONDS, 10 Surety-Appellant. 11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY 12 Mark Terrence Sanchez, District Judge 13 Gary K. King, Attorney General 14 Jacqueline R. Medina, Assistant Attorney General 15 Albuquerque, NM 16 for Appellee 17 Bennett J. Baur, Acting Chief Public Defender 18 Larry K. Bishop, Assistant Public Defender 19 Hobbs, NM 1 for Defendant 2 Daniel Goldberg 3 Farmington, NM 4 Pro Se Surety-Appellant 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION 6 KENNEDY, Chief Judge. 7 {1} Daniel Goldberg, d/b/a Goodfellas Bail Bonds (Surety) appeals pro se from the 8 district court s amended judgment of default of conditions on bond, claiming that the 9 district court abused its discretion in requiring Surety to pay $2,000 of a $3,000 bond 10 when Defendant did not appear at the scheduled arraignment. We issued a notice of 11 proposed summary disposition proposing to reverse in light of the clear language set 12 forth in NMSA 1978, Section 31-3-2(F) (1993). Surety filed a timely memorandum 13 in support of our proposed disposition, and the State filed a notice indicating that it 14 will not file a response in opposition. 15 {2} Therefore, for the reasons set forth in our notice of proposed summary 16 disposition, we reverse the district court s order. 17 18 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ 2 1 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge 2 WE CONCUR: 3 _________________________________ 4 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 5 _________________________________ 6 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
