IN THE MATTER OF ARNOLD H. MINIMAN

Annotate this Case

This case can also be found at 195 N.J. 276, 949 A.2d 761.


SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

D- 170 September Term 2007




IN THE MATTER OF :


ARNOLD H. MINIMAN, :

O R D E R

Judge of the Municipal :

Court of the Borough

of Mount Arlington :

 

 

The Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct having filed with the Court a presentment pursuant to Rule2:15-15(a) recommending that ARNOLD H. MINIMAN, Judge of the Municipal Court of the Borough of Mount Arlington, be reprimanded for violating Canon 1 (a judge should maintain high standards of conduct so the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved), Canon 2A (a judge should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary), Canon 3C(1) (a judge must disqualify himself from proceedings in which the judge s impartiality might reasonably be questioned) of the Code of Judicial Conductand for engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute (Rule2:15-8(a)(6));

And respondent, through counsel, having waived his right to a hearing before the Supreme Court and having submitted himself to the judgment of the Court based on the presentment and the record before the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct;

And the Court having determined that a reprimand, as recommended by the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct in its presentment, is the appropriate quantum of discipline;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the presentment of the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct is adopted and JudgeARNOLD H. MINIMAN is hereby reprimanded.

 

WITNESS, the Honorable Stuart Rabner, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 19th day of June, 2008.

 

/s/ Stephen W. Townsend

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT

 

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, WALLACE, and HOENS join in the Court's Order. JUSTICE RIVERA-SOTO dissents from the Order and would impose an admonition on respondent.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.