State v. Zurawski

Annotate this Case

47 N.J. 160 (1966)

219 A.2d 614

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MERDIE ZURAWSKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued April 25, 1966.

Decided May 9, 1966.

Mr. Hyman Isaac argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Barry Epstein, on the brief; Messrs. Reibel, Isaac & Tannenbaum, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph A. Hoffman argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney.)

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Brown in the Appellate Division.

For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO. 6.

For reversal None.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.