Fluoro Electric Corp. v. Smith Transport Ltd.

Annotate this Case

32 N.J. 277 (1960)

160 A.2d 627

FLUORO ELECTRIC CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SMITH TRANSPORT LIMITED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued April 25, 1960.

Decided May 9, 1960.

Mr. Jerome S. Lieb argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. Harkavy & Lieb, attorneys).

Mr. Arthur Slavitt argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Conford in the court below.

BURLING, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO 7.

For reversal None.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.