GOLDEN CARRIERS, INC. v. EVERGREEN SHIPPING AGENCY
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-0
GOLDEN CARRIERS, INC.; BBT
LOGISTICS; CRYSTAL COLD STORAGE,
INC., d/b/a AMERICA'S WAY
TRUCKING; DIPINTO BROTHERS
TRANSPORTATION, INC.; F.O.X.
INTERMODAL CORPORATION; GLENDALE
CARRIERS CORPORATION; H&M INTERNATIONAL
TRANSPORTATION, INC.; INTERNATIONAL
MOTOR FREIGHT, INC.; J WAY COMPANY,
INC.; MARINE CONTAINER SERVICES, INC.;
MECCA & SONS TRUCKING COMPANY, INC.;
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION, LLC; M.T.C.
TRANSPORTATION; NATIONAL PACKERS EXPRESS,
INC.; PJT TRANSPORT, INC; ROMAC EXPRESS,
INC.; SEA TRANSFER CORPORATION; and
UNCOMMON CARRIER, INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants/
Cross-Respondents,
and
FMI TRUCKING; INTERMETRO FREIGHT,
INC.; MTI INC.; and P. JUDGE &
SONS, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
EVERGREEN SHIPPING AGENCY
(AMERICA) CORPORATION and
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY
(U.S.), INC.,
Defendants,
v.
MAHER TERMINALS, LLC,
Defendant-Respondent/
Cross-Appellant.
________________________________________________________________
December 19, 2016
Submitted December 6, 2016 Decided
Before Judges Messano, Espinosa and Suter.
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, Docket No. L-1981-09.
Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., attorneys for appellants/cross-respondents (Marvin J. Brauth, Eric J. Marcy and Richard J. Byrnes, of counsel and on the briefs).
Rogut McCarthy, LLC, attorneys for respondent/cross-appellant (Daniel J. McCarthy and Diane U. Dabulas, on the briefs).
PER CURIAM
The court being advised by the parties in the above matter that the issues in dispute have been amicably resolved, the appeal is accordingly dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.