VAN VELSOR GROUP, LLC v. DAVID ANDERSON

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-0

VAN VELSOR GROUP, LLC,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

DAVID ANDERSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________

July 14, 2015

Submitted July 7, 2015 Decided

Before Judges Fisher and Fasciale.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Special Civil Part, Essex County, Docket No. LT-36518-13.

David Anderson, appellant pro se.

Respondent has not filed a brief.

PER CURIAM

In this tenancy matter, defendant David Anderson, the former tenant of an apartment located in Newark, appeals a warrant of removal, which he refers to in his notice of appeal as the judgment in this case.

In this appeal, defendant presents nothing to suggest a valid defense to the eviction action; instead, he argues in a single point

WITH THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COURTS AND THE PLAINTIFF, THERE'S NO SURPRISE THAT THE CASE WAS MISHANDLED AND REVIEWED WITH BIAS AND UNFAIRNESS.

We find insufficient merit in this argument to warrant discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). We add only that any alleged confusion in the post-judgment proceedings was caused solely by defendant's multiple meritless applications for relief from the warrant of removal.

After carefully examining the transcripts of the trial court proceedings, we find absolutely no evidence or indicia of bias. To the contrary, defendant was treated fairly, and his contentions were thoroughly examined and considered by the experienced trial judge.

Affirmed.