JENNY CHIN v. VINCENT CHIN

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-0

JENNY CHIN, n/k/a JENNY

BUCK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

VINCENT CHIN,

Defendant-Respondent.

_______________________________

February 20, 2014

Submitted December 18, 2013 Decided

Before Judges Waugh and Nugent.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Ocean County, Docket No. FM-15-1216-99.

Jenny Buck, appellant pro se.

Vincent Chin, respondent pro se.

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff Jenny Buck appeals the Family Part's denial of portions of her post-judgment cross-motion concerning financial obligations arising from her divorce from defendant Vincent Chin. Buck argues that the motion judge erred in sending the parties to mediation and in denying other aspects of the relief sought in her cross-motion.

We dismiss the appeal as it relates to financial mediation. The judge ordered the parties to return to her for further adjudication if mediation was unsuccessful. We understand that mediation was not successful, but that the parties have not followed the judge's instruction that they return to her for adjudication of the financial issues. Consequently, that aspect of the order was interlocutory. R. 2:2-3(a). The parties may pursue the issues involved in the Family Part.

Having reviewed the remaining issues raised on appeal, we find them to be without merit and not warranting discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Consequently, we affirm for the reasons set forth by Judge Melanie D. Appleby in her June 1, 2012 order.