GEORGE R. ELENBARK v. STEVEN J. EVANS
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-6002-09T2
GEORGE R. ELENBARK,
Plaintiff-Respondent/
Cross-Respondent,
v.
STEVEN J. EVANS,
Defendant-Respondent/
Cross-Appellant,
and
RIDER INSURANCE COMPANY,
FARM FAMILY CASUALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE
FARM INSURANCE COMPANY,
and JEROME HOPE,
Defendants,
and
RACK'S BAR AND GRILL,
Defendant-Appellant/
Cross-Respondent.
____________________________________
JANE SPARE, AS ADMINISTRATRIX
AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE HEIRS AT
LAW OF MARY ELENBARK, DECEASED,
Plaintiff-Respondent/
Cross-Respondent,
v.
RACK'S BAR AND GRILL, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant/
Cross-Respondent,
and
STEVEN J. EVANS,
Defendant-Respondent/
Cross-Appellant,
and
JEROME HOPE,
Defendant,
and
GEORGE R. ELENBARK,
Defendant-Respondent/
Cross-Respondent.
_____________________________________
February 22, 2013
Argued October 17, 2012 - Decided
Before Judges Axelrad, Sapp-Peterson and Haas.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Docket Nos. L-201-08 and L-854-08.
Michael J. Marone argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent Rack's Bar and Grill, Inc. (McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney and Carpenter, L.L.P., attorneys; Elizabeth A. Wilson, on the brief).
Daniel J. Pomeroy argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant Steven J. Evans (Mortenson and Pomeroy, attorneys; Mr. Pomeroy and Karen E. Heller, on the brief).
Robert A. Porter argued the cause for respondent/cross-respondent George R. Elenbark (Bafundo, Porter, Borbi & Clancy, L.L.C., attorneys; Mr. Porter, on the brief).
Michael A. Kaplan argued the cause for respondent/cross-respondent Jane Spare (Jarvie, Kaplan, Granato, L.L.C., attorneys; Mr. Kaplan, of counsel and on the brief; Paul Depetris, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
We have been advised, following oral argument, that this matter has been amicably adjusted and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.