GEORGE R. ELENBARK v. STEVEN J. EVANS

Annotate this Case

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

 

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-6002-09T2


GEORGE R. ELENBARK,


Plaintiff-Respondent/

Cross-Respondent,


v.


STEVEN J. EVANS,


Defendant-Respondent/

Cross-Appellant,


and


RIDER INSURANCE COMPANY,

FARM FAMILY CASUALTY

INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE

FARM INSURANCE COMPANY,

and JEROME HOPE,


Defendants,


and


RACK'S BAR AND GRILL,


Defendant-Appellant/

Cross-Respondent.

____________________________________


JANE SPARE, AS ADMINISTRATRIX

AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE HEIRS AT

LAW OF MARY ELENBARK, DECEASED,


Plaintiff-Respondent/

Cross-Respondent,


v.


RACK'S BAR AND GRILL, INC.,


Defendant-Appellant/

Cross-Respondent,


and


STEVEN J. EVANS,


Defendant-Respondent/

Cross-Appellant,


and


JEROME HOPE,


Defendant,


and


GEORGE R. ELENBARK,


Defendant-Respondent/

Cross-Respondent.


_____________________________________

February 22, 2013

 

Argued October 17, 2012 - Decided

 

Before Judges Axelrad, Sapp-Peterson and Haas.

 

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Docket Nos. L-201-08 and L-854-08.

 

Michael J. Marone argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent Rack's Bar and Grill, Inc. (McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney and Carpenter, L.L.P., attorneys; Elizabeth A. Wilson, on the brief).

 

Daniel J. Pomeroy argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant Steven J. Evans (Mortenson and Pomeroy, attorneys; Mr. Pomeroy and Karen E. Heller, on the brief).

 

Robert A. Porter argued the cause for respondent/cross-respondent George R. Elenbark (Bafundo, Porter, Borbi & Clancy, L.L.C., attorneys; Mr. Porter, on the brief).

 

Michael A. Kaplan argued the cause for respondent/cross-respondent Jane Spare (Jarvie, Kaplan, Granato, L.L.C., attorneys; Mr. Kaplan, of counsel and on the brief; Paul Depetris, on the brief).


PER CURIAM


We have been advised, following oral argument, that this matter has been amicably adjusted and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.