STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION OF FISH & WILDLIFE v. MARYBETH SURMONTE-BENNETT

Annotate this Case


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

 

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-4972-10T4


STATE OF NEW JERSEY,

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION, DIVISION OF

FISH & WILDLIFE,


Plaintiff-Respondent,


v.


MARYBETH SURMONTE-BENNETT,


Defendant-Appellant.


_________________________________


ArguedMarch 14, 2012 Decided March29, 2012

 

Before Judges Cuff and Waugh.

 

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Atlantic County, Municipal Appeal No. 0054-10.

 

Gina A. Calogero argued the cause for appellant (Law Offices of Gina A. Calogero, attorneys; C. Peter Burro, on the briefs).

 

James T. Hill, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Jeffrey S. Chiesa, Attorney General, attorney; Lewis A. Scheindlin, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. Hill, on the brief).

 

PER CURIAM


Defendant Marybeth Surmonte-Bennett appeals the judgment of the Law Division, following a trial de novo on the record from the municipal court of Little Egg Harbor Township, imposing civil fines pursuant to N.J.S.A. 23:2A-10(e) for (1) illegal possession of a regulated non-game species, a Great Horned Owl, without a permit, in violation of N.J.A.C. 7:25-4.2(a); (2) illegal possession of a regulated non-game species, a Cooper's Hawk, without a permit, in violation of N.J.A.C. 7:25-4.2(a); and (3) illegal liberation of a regulated non-game species, a Cooper's Hawk, without a permit, in violation of N.J.A.C. 7:25-4.2(b). The judge imposed a $2500 fine for each violation, to be paid at the rate of $150 per month, consecutive to payment of fines previously imposed in a similar civil enforcement action also arising out of Little Egg Harbor.1

Having carefully reviewed the arguments made by Surmonte-Bennett in light of the record on appeal, we find those arguments to be without merit and not warranting discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Consequently, we affirm for the reasons stated by Judge Charles Middlesworth, Jr., in his comprehensive written decision of May 2, 2011.

Affirmed.

1 N.J. Dep't of Envtl. Prot., Div. of Fish & Wildlife v. Bennett, No. A-2693-06 (App. Div. Dec. 4), certif. denied, 197 N.J. 258 (2008).



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.