HACKENSACK RADIOLOGY GROUP, P.A v. RISHI RAKSHPAL

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-5590-09T2

HACKENSACK RADIOLOGY GROUP, P.A.,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

RISHI RAKSHPAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________________________

Submitted May 24, 2011 Decided June 7, 2011

Before Judges Espinosa and Skillman.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Docket No. L-

3854-10.

Rishi Rakshpal, appellant pro se.

Michael Harrison, attorney for respondent (Stacy Fronapfel, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from an order entered on June 7, 2010, which denied his motion to transfer this action from the Special Civil Part to the Law Division. An order that denies transfer of an action is not a final judgment because it does not adjudicate the claims asserted in the complaint and any counterclaims. See Janicky v. Point Bay Fuel, Inc., 396 N.J. Super. 545, 549-50 (App. Div. 2007). Thus, such an order may be appealed only by leave of this court. See R. 2:5-6(a). Defendant did not seek leave to appeal the order denying his motion to transfer, and we undoubtedly would have denied such a motion if it had been made.