NATHANIEL DIXON v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD

Annotate this Case

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-3076-08T23076-08T2

NATHANIEL DIXON,

Appellant,

v.

NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD,

Respondent.

_________________________________

 

Submitted July 6, 2010 - Decided

Before Judges Stern and Wefing.

On appeal from a Final Agency Decision

of the New Jersey State Parole Board.

Nathaniel Dixon, appellant pro se.

Paula T. Dow, Attorney General, attorney

for respondent (Melissa H. Raksa, Assistant

Attorney General, of counsel; Ellen M. Hale,

Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

Nathaniel Dixon is an inmate in the custody of the Department of Corrections. He appeals from a determination of the New Jersey State Parole Board setting his parole eligibility date at October 22, 2020. We affirm.

Defendant argues that the Parole Board did not properly credit him with 5164 days of jail credits, awarded to him pursuant to an amended judgment of conviction entered by the trial court on October 27, 1997. Defendant's argument disregards the fact that the 1997 amended judgment of conviction was itself subsequently amended on December 6, 2000. The 2000 judgment of conviction awards defendant only 3304 days of jail credit. It is this figure which must be used in calculating defendant's parole eligibility date.

Defendant's argument to the contrary lacks merit. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(D).

Affirmed.

 

(continued)

(continued)

2

A-3076-08T2

August 2, 2010

 


Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.