SHIRLEY GOODHEART v. RAMESH ACHARYA

Annotate this Case

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-1014-08T21014-08T2

SHIRLEY GOODHEART,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RAMESH ACHARYA,

Defendant-Respondent.

__________________________________________________________

 

Submitted June 29, 2010 - Decided

Before Judges Skillman and Wefing.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Morris County, Docket No. FM-14-613-94.

Shirley Goodheart, appellant pro se.

Respondent Ramesh Acharya did not file a brief.

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals from the parts of post-judgment orders entered on July 9, 2008, September 9, 2008 and August 26, 2009, relating to her child support obligations and the denial of her claims to a "residential/educational credit" and counsel fees. We affirm the challenged parts of those orders substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Weisenbeck's statement of reasons attached to those orders. Although oral argument should have been scheduled on plaintiff's motions, the court's rulings are clearly correct and therefore plaintiff did not suffer any prejudice as a result of the denial of the opportunity for oral argument.

Affirmed.

 

(continued)

(continued)

2

A-1014-08T2

August 9, 2010

 


Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.