SHIRLEY GOODHEART v. RAMESH ACHARYA
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-1014-08T21014-08T2
SHIRLEY GOODHEART,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RAMESH ACHARYA,
Defendant-Respondent.
__________________________________________________________
Submitted June 29, 2010 - Decided
Before Judges Skillman and Wefing.
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Morris County, Docket No. FM-14-613-94.
Shirley Goodheart, appellant pro se.
Respondent Ramesh Acharya did not file a brief.
PER CURIAM
Plaintiff appeals from the parts of post-judgment orders entered on July 9, 2008, September 9, 2008 and August 26, 2009, relating to her child support obligations and the denial of her claims to a "residential/educational credit" and counsel fees. We affirm the challenged parts of those orders substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Weisenbeck's statement of reasons attached to those orders. Although oral argument should have been scheduled on plaintiff's motions, the court's rulings are clearly correct and therefore plaintiff did not suffer any prejudice as a result of the denial of the opportunity for oral argument.
Affirmed.
(continued)
(continued)
2
A-1014-08T2
August 9, 2010
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.