W.C v. ROBERT RINGWALD

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-0581-09T30581-09T3

W.C.,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

ROBERT RINGWALD,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

 

Submitted May 25, 2010 - Decided

Before Judges Carchman and Parrillo.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County, Docket No. FV-02-456-10 and FV-02-470-10,

Ferro and Ferro, attorneys for appellant (Ralph A. Ferro and Nancy C. Ferro, on the brief).

W.C., respondent pro se, has not filed a brief.

PER CURIAM

 
The court being advised by the attorney for the appellant that the matter is moot because the order from which the appeal was taken has been vacated, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.

(continued)

(continued)

2

A-0581-09T3

RECORD IMPOUNDED

July 13, 2010