MILAN STEVANOVICH v. NEIL BHASKAR

 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-4130-07T34130-07T3

MILAN STEVANOVICH,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

vs.

NEIL BHASKAR and ARICUS

INTERNATIONAL, LLC,

Defendants-Appellants.

__________________________________

 

Submitted: January 28, 2009 - Decided:

Before Judges Cuff and C.L. Miniman.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Mercer County, Docket No. DJ-18192-08.

Hartsough Kenny Chase & Sullivan, attorneys for appellants (David J. Kenny, on the brief).

Edward A. Feinberg, attorney for respondent.

PER CURIAM

Defendant Neil Bhaskar appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate a default judgment entered against him in Michigan and registered in New Jersey pursuant to the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:49A-25 to -33. He argued that the Michigan judgment was invalid because the Michigan court lacked personal jurisdiction over him.

The argument presented by Bhaskar is without sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E); McKesson Corp. v. Hackensack Med. Imaging, ___ N.J. ___, ___ (2009) (slip op. at 1-2, 13-14).

Affirmed.

 

(continued)

(continued)

2

A-4130-07T3

February 9, 2009